You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Magmatic effects of the Cobb hot spot on the Juan de Fuca Ridge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2003jb002767 |
| Authors |
John Chadwick, Michael Perfit, Ian Ridley, Ian Jonasson, George Kamenov, William Chadwick, Robert Embley, Petrus le Roux, Matthew Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 25% |
| Researcher | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 45 | 79% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Energy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,472
of 76,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#33
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.