↓ Skip to main content

Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency masquerading as a mitochondrial encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency masquerading as a mitochondrial encephalopathy
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10545-006-0478-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. A. M. Morris, R. E. Appleton, B. Power, D. M. Isherwood, L. J. Abernethy, R. W. Taylor, D. M. Turnbull, N. M. Verhoeven, G. S. Salomons, C. Jakobs

Abstract

Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency is a rare disorder of creatine synthesis. We report a patient who presented at 10 months of age with hypotonia and global developmental delay. Subsequently, she developed seizures and choreoathetosis. Magnetic resonance imaging showed high signal bilaterally in the globus pallidus on T2-weighted images. Mitochondrial respiratory chain studies revealed low complex I activity (in muscle 0.052 nmol NADH oxidized per min per unit citrate synthase, controls 0.166 +/- 0.047; in fibroblasts 0.080 nmol NADH oxidized per min per unit citrate synthase, controls 0.197 +/- 0.034). The true diagnosis was suspected at 21 months of age because of persistent low plasma and urine creatinine concentrations. GAMT activity was undetectable in fibroblasts and compound heterozygous mutations were found in the GAMT gene (c.327G>A and c.522G>A). The patient was treated with creatine, dietary arginine restriction and ornithine supplements. Her movement disorder and seizures resolved but she still has severe cognitive impairment and no expressive language. The occurrence of secondary respiratory chain abnormalities in GAMT deficiency may lead to misdiagnosis, particularly as the clinical and radiological features resemble those seen in mitochondrial encephalopathies. It is important to establish the correct diagnosis because specific treatment is available.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Lecturer 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2011.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#684
of 1,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,771
of 156,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.