↓ Skip to main content

The prospect of alien life in exotic forms on other worlds

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The prospect of alien life in exotic forms on other worlds
Published in
The Science of Nature, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00114-005-0078-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk Schulze-Makuch, Louis N. Irwin

Abstract

The nature of life on Earth provides a singular example of carbon-based, water-borne, photosynthesis-driven biology. Within our understanding of chemistry and the physical laws governing the universe, however, lies the possibility that alien life could be based on different chemistries, solvents, and energy sources from the one example provided by Terran biology. In this paper, we review some of these possibilities. Silanes may be used as functional analogs to carbon molecules in environments very different from Earth; solvents other than water may be compatible for life-supporting processes, especially in cold environments, and a variety of energy sources may be utilized, some of which have no Terran analog. We provide a detailed discussion of two possible habitats for alien life which are generally not considered as such: the lower cloud level of the Venusian atmosphere and Titan's surface environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Professor 5 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 13%
Chemistry 10 9%
Physics and Astronomy 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,980,871
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#378
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,631
of 71,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.