| Title |
The trophic ecology of Caribbean reef sharks (Carcharhinus perezi) relative to other large teleost predators on an isolated coral atoll
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-018-3322-2 |
| Authors |
Mark E. Bond, Jasmine Valentin-Albanese, Elizabeth A. Babcock, Nigel E. Hussey, Michael R. Heithaus, Demian D. Chapman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 24% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Belize | 2 | 5% |
| Bahamas | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 69% |
| Scientists | 12 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,122,124
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#125
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,095
of 337,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#3
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.