↓ Skip to main content

A missense mutation in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha gene in a UK pedigree with maturity-onset diabetes of the young

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
A missense mutation in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha gene in a UK pedigree with maturity-onset diabetes of the young
Published in
Diabetologia, June 1997
DOI 10.1007/s001250050760
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. P. Bulman, M. J. Dronsfield, T. Frayling, M. Appleton, S. C. Bain, S. Ellard, A. T. Hattersley

Abstract

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a monogenic subgroup of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) characterised bylan early age of onset (< 25 years) and an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. MODY is genetically heterogeneous with three different genes identified to date; hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF-4 alpha) [MODY1], glucokinase [MODY2] and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha (HNF-1 alpha) [MODY3]. A nonsense mutation in the HNF-4 alpha gene has recently been shown to cause MODY in a single large North American pedigree (RW). We screened a large UK Caucasian MODY family which showed weak evidence of linkage to the MODY1 locus on chromosome 20q (lod score for ADA 0.68 at theta = 0) for mutations in the coding region of the HNF-4 alpha gene by direct sequencing. A missense mutation resulting in the substitution of glutamine for glutamic acid was identified in exon 7 (E276Q). The mutation was present in all of the diabetic members of the pedigree plus two unaffected subjects and was not detected in 75 normal control subjects or 95 UK Caucasian subjects with late-onset NIDDM. This is the first missense mutation to be described in the HNF-4 alpha gene.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Researcher 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,233
of 5,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,289
of 29,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.