↓ Skip to main content

Multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms (MDRO) in end-of-life care: development of recommendations for hospitalized patients using a mixed-methods approach

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms (MDRO) in end-of-life care: development of recommendations for hospitalized patients using a mixed-methods approach
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00520-018-4149-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Heckel, Stephanie Stiel, Franziska A. Herbst, Johanna M. Tiedtke, Alexander Sturm, Thomas Adelhardt, Christian Bogdan, Cornel Sieber, Oliver Schöffski, Frieder R. Lang, Christoph Ostgathe

Abstract

Palliative care professionals are frequently confronted with patients colonized or infected with MDRO. One major challenge is how to balance necessary isolation measures and social inclusion as one of the main principles of palliative and end-of-life care. To date, MDRO-specific policies and protocols vary widely between institutions. provide empirical recommendations on how to deal with hospitalized MDRO patients in end-of-life care. Recommendations were developed based on (i) initial results of face-to-face interviews and focus groups, (ii) impartial experts' comments and consensus on the draft via online survey and (iii) a face-to-face meeting with consortium members to finalize recommendations. Findings of 158 interviews and six focus groups (39 participants) with patients, family caregivers, staff members and institutional stakeholders contributed to the recommendations. The assessments of 17 experts were considered. In total, 21 recommendations were approved. The recommended strategy in dealing with MDRO at the end of life allows case-based application of protection and isolation measures. MDRO diagnostics and therapy involve screening at admission. The recommendations suggest consideration of required accommodation facilities, provided material as well as staff and time resources. The recommendations further highlight the importance of providing for strategies enabling the patient's social inclusion and provision of verbal and written information about MDRO for patients and family caregivers, transparent medical documentation, and staff member training. The recommendations summarize the perspectives of individuals and groups affected by MDRO at the end of life and provide practical guidance for clinical routine. Further dissemination and implementation requirements are discussed and should contain the evaluation of the knowledge, views, worries, and anxieties of the target groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 17 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Psychology 3 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,791,066
of 24,792,566 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,615
of 4,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,071
of 338,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#51
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,792,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.