| Title |
SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-010-1268-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Wayne Overby, Keith N. Apelgren, William Richardson, Robert Fanelli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Researcher | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 23% |
| Unknown | 46 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 154 | 64% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,974
of 7,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,260
of 108,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.