↓ Skip to main content

In vitro efficacy of ARQ 092, an allosteric AKT inhibitor, on primary fibroblast cells derived from patients with PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS)

Overview of attention for article published in neurogenetics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
In vitro efficacy of ARQ 092, an allosteric AKT inhibitor, on primary fibroblast cells derived from patients with PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS)
Published in
neurogenetics, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10048-018-0540-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Ranieri, S. Di Tommaso, D. C. Loconte, V. Grossi, P. Sanese, R. Bagnulo, F. C. Susca, G. Forte, A. Peserico, A. De Luisi, A. Bartuli, A. Selicorni, D. Melis, M. Lerone, A. D. Praticò, G. Abbadessa, Y. Yu, B. Schwartz, Martino Ruggieri, Cristiano Simone, Nicoletta Resta

Abstract

Postzygotic mutations of the PIK3CA [phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha] gene constitutively activate the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) patients, causing congenital mosaic tissue overgrowth that even multiple surgeries cannot solve. mTOR inhibitors are empirically tested and given for compassionate use in these patients. PROS patients could be ideal candidates for enrolment in trials with PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors, considering the "clean" cellular setting in which a unique driver, a PIK3CA mutation, is present. We aimed to assess the effects of blocking the upstream pathway of mTOR on PROS patient-derived cells by using ARQ 092, a potent, selective, allosteric, and experimental orally bioavailable and highly selective AKT-inhibitor with activity and long-term tolerability, currently under clinical development for treatment of cancer and Proteus syndrome. Cell samples (i.e., primary fibroblasts) were derived from cultured tissues obtained from six PROS patients [3 boys, 3 girls; aged 2 to 17 years] whose spectrum of PIK3A-related overgrowth included HHML [hemihyperplasia multiple lipomatosis; n = 1], CLOVES [congenital lipomatosis, overgrowth, vascular malformations, epidermal nevi, spinal/skeletal anomalies, scoliosis; n = 1], and MCAP [megalencephaly capillary malformation syndrome; n = 4]. We performed the following: (a) a deep sequencing assay of PI3K/AKT pathway genes in the six PROS patients' derived cells to identify the causative mutations and (b) a pathway analysis to assess the phosphorylation status of AKT [Ser473 and Thr308] and its downstream targets [pAKTS1 (Thr246), pRPS6 (Ser235/236), and pRPS6Kβ1 (Ser371)]. The anti-proliferative effect of ARQ 092 was tested and compared to other PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors [i.e., wortmannin, LY249002, and rapamycin] in the six PROS patient-derived cells. Using ARQ 092 to target AKT, a critical node connecting PI3K and mTOR pathways, we observed the following: (1) strong anti-proliferative activity [ARQ 092 at 0.5, 1, and 2.5 μM blunted phosphorylation of AKT and its downstream targets (in the presence or absence of serum) and inhibited proliferation after 72 h; rapamycin at 100 nM did not decrease AKT phosphorylation] and (2) less cytotoxicity as compared to rapamycin and wortmannin. We demonstrated the following: (a) that PROS cells are dependent on AKT; (b) the advantage of inhibiting the pathway immediately downstream of PI3K to circumventing problems depending on multiple classes a PI3K kinases; and (c) that PROS patients benefit from inhibition of AKT rather than mTOR. Clinical development of ARQ 092 in PROS patients is on going in these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Other 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 23 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 26 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,508,179
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from neurogenetics
#239
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,241
of 333,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from neurogenetics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.