↓ Skip to main content

Torpor and thermal energetics in a tiny Australian vespertilionid, the little forest bat (Vespadelus vulturnus)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Torpor and thermal energetics in a tiny Australian vespertilionid, the little forest bat (Vespadelus vulturnus)
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00360-005-0008-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig K. R. Willis, Christopher Turbill, Fritz Geiser

Abstract

Data on thermal energetics for vespertilionid bats are under-represented in the literature relative to their abundance, as are data for bats of very small body mass. Therefore, we studied torpor use and thermal energetics in one of the smallest (4 g) Australian vespertilionids, Vespadelus vulturnus. We used open-flow respirometry to quantify temporal patterns of torpor use, upper and lower critical temperatures (T (uc) and T (lc)) of the thermoneutral zone (TNZ), basal metabolic rate (BMR), resting metabolic rate (RMR), torpid metabolic rate (TMR), and wet thermal conductance (C (wet)) over a range of ambient temperatures (T (a)). We also measured body temperature (T (b)) during torpor and normothermia. Bats showed a high proclivity for torpor and typically aroused only for brief periods. The TNZ ranged from 27.6 degrees C to 33.3 degrees C. Within the TNZ T (b) was 33.3+/-0.4 degrees C and BMR was 1.02+/-0.29 ml O(2) g(-1) h(-1) (5.60+/-1.65 mW g(-1)) at a mean body mass of 4.0+/-0.69 g, which is 55 % of that predicted for a 4 g bat. Minimum TMR of torpid bats was 0.014+/-0.006 ml O(2) g(-1) h(-1) (0.079+/-0.032 mW g(-1)) at T (a)=4.6+/-0.4 degrees C and T (b)=7.5+/-1.9. T (lc) and C (wet) of normothermic bats were both lower than that predicted for a 4 g bat, which indicates that V. vulturnus is adapted to minimising heat loss at low T (a). Our findings support the hypothesis that vespertilionid bats have evolved energy-conserving physiological traits, such as low BMR and proclivity for torpor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 74%
Environmental Science 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Unknown 6 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,135,326
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#236
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,567
of 60,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.