| Title |
Molecular and biological characterization of a novel mild strain of citrus tristeza virus in California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Virology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00705-018-3799-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raymond Yokomi, Vijayanandraj Selvaraj, Yogita Maheshwari, Michela Chiumenti, Maria Saponari, Annalisa Giampetruzzi, Ziming Weng, Zhongguo Xiong, Subhas Hajeri |
| Abstract |
Strain differentiating marker profiles of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) isolates from California have shown the presence of multiple genotypes. To better define the genetic diversity involved, full-length genome sequences from four California CTV isolates were determined by small-interfering RNA sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis and nucleotide sequence comparisons differentiated these isolates into the genotypes VT (CA-VT-AT39), T30 (CA-T30-AT4), and a new strain called S1 (CA-S1-L and CA-S1-L65). S1 isolates had three common recombination events within portions of genes from VT, T36 and RB strains and were transmissible by Aphis gossypii. Virus indexing showed that CA-VT-AT39 could be classified as a severe strain, whereas CA-T30-AT4, CA-S1-L and CA-S1-L65 were mild. CA-VT-AT39, CA-S1-L, and CA-S1-L65 reacted with monoclonal antibody MCA13, whereas CA-T30-AT4 did not. RT-PCR and RT-qPCR detection assays for the S1 strain were developed and used to screen MCA13-reactive isolates in a CTV collection from central California collected from 1968 to 2011. Forty-two isolates were found to contain the S1 strain, alone or in combinations with other genotypes. BLAST and phylogenetic analysis of the S1 p25 gene region with other extant CTV sequences from the NCBI database suggested that putative S1-like isolates might occur elsewhere (e.g., China, South Korea, Turkey, Bosnia and Croatia). This information is important for CTV evolution, detection of specific strains, and cross-protection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,970,944
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#2,498
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,258
of 359,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#22
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.