↓ Skip to main content

Regional disparity in China 1985–1994: The effects of globalization and economic liberalization

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Regional Science, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
274 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Regional disparity in China 1985–1994: The effects of globalization and economic liberalization
Published in
The Annals of Regional Science, February 2001
DOI 10.1007/s001680000020
Authors

Masahisa Fujita, Dapeng Hu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 22%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 49 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 57 30%
Social Sciences 32 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 22 12%
Engineering 5 3%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 50 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Regional Science
#130
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,135
of 113,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Regional Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them