Title |
Natural Disasters and Economic Growth: A Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13753-014-0022-5 |
Authors |
Nourin Shabnam |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 174 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 19% |
Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
Researcher | 18 | 10% |
Lecturer | 12 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 17% |
Unknown | 46 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 51 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 8% |
Engineering | 10 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 12% |
Unknown | 55 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,023,134
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
#49
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,334
of 233,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.