↓ Skip to main content

The role of telomere binding molecules for normal and abnormal hematopoiesis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The role of telomere binding molecules for normal and abnormal hematopoiesis
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12185-018-2432-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kentaro Hosokawa, Fumio Arai

Abstract

In order to maintain the homeostasis of the hematopoietic system, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) need to be maintained while slowly dividing over their lifetime. However, repeated cell divisions lead to the gradual accumulation of DNA damage and ultimately impair HSC function. Since telomeres are particularly fragile when subjected to replication stress, cells have several defense machinery to protect telomeres. Moreover, HSCs must protect their genome against possible DNA damage, while maintaining telomere length. A group of proteins called the shelterin complex are deeply involved in this two-way role, and it is highly resistant to the replication stress to which HSCs are subjected. Most shelterin-deficient experimental models suffer acute cytotoxicity and severe phenotypes, as each shelterin component is essential for telomere protection. The Tin2 point mutant mice show a dyskeratosis congenita (DC) like phenotype, and the Tpp1 deletion impairs the hematopoietic system. POT1/Pot1a is highly expressed in HSCs and contributes to the maintenance of the HSC pool during in vitro culture. Here, we discuss the role of shelterin molecules in HSC regulation and review current understanding of how these are regulated in the maintenance of the HSC pool and the development of hematological disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,591,506
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#929
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,797
of 359,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.