↓ Skip to main content

A randomised controlled study examining the short-term effects of Strain–Counterstrain treatment on quantitative sensory measures at digitally tender points in the low back

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomised controlled study examining the short-term effects of Strain–Counterstrain treatment on quantitative sensory measures at digitally tender points in the low back
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2010.05.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynan Lewis, Asad Khan, Tina Souvlis, Michele Sterling

Abstract

Strain-Counterstrain (SCS) intervention has been claimed to elicit immediate and sustained reductions in tenderness at digitally tender points (DTPs), however, there is little experimental evidence to support this. Twenty-eight volunteer participants with low back pain--LBP (17 females and 11 males with mean [SD] age of 39.2 [11.1] and Oswestry disability index of 15.7 [8.6]) participated in this controlled, within-participants study of the immediate and short-term effects of SCS intervention, on pressure pain threshold (PPT) electrical detection threshold (EDT) and electrical pain threshold (EPT) at DTPs in the low back region. Immediate increases in PPT at DTPs were found following all interventions; control intervention: 30.7 kPa [CI 95% - 3.3-64.8] (p = 0.041), sham-SCS intervention: 48.2kPa [CI 95% 14.8-81.7] (p = 0.008) and SCS intervention: 93.4kPa [CI 95% 60.0-126.9] (p<0.0001). Results suggest that SCS intervention does elicit an immediate quantifiable reduction in tenderness at DTPs but that some of this reduction is attributable to the manual-contact component of the treatment. Increases in PPT at DTPs following SCS intervention did not appear to be maintained between 24 and 96 h after treatment. A further finding was that the control intervention elicited significant increases in both EDT (p = 0.044) and EPT (p = 0.026). The explanation for these findings is unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 23 18%