↓ Skip to main content

Osteoimmunology: Interactions of the Bone and Immune System

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine Reviews, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
461 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Osteoimmunology: Interactions of the Bone and Immune System
Published in
Endocrine Reviews, May 2008
DOI 10.1210/er.2007-0038
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Lorenzo, Mark Horowitz, Yongwon Choi

Abstract

Bone and the immune system are both complex tissues that respectively regulate the skeleton and the body's response to invading pathogens. It has now become clear that these organ systems often interact in their function. This is particularly true for the development of immune cells in the bone marrow and for the function of bone cells in health and disease. Because these two disciplines developed independently, investigators in each don't always fully appreciate the significance that the other system has on the function of the tissue they are studying. This review is meant to provide a broad overview of the many ways that bone and immune cells interact so that a better understanding of the role that each plays in the development and function of the other can develop. It is hoped that an appreciation of the interactions of these two organ systems will lead to better therapeutics for diseases that affect either or both.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 312 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 16%
Researcher 41 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 10%
Student > Postgraduate 27 8%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Other 86 26%
Unknown 60 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 73 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 3%
Engineering 9 3%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 81 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,029,901
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine Reviews
#328
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,564
of 80,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine Reviews
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.