| Title |
Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5142-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhongheng Zhang, Yucai Hong, Ning Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 6 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Denmark | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 18% |
| Scientists | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 22% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 37% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#833,220
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#784
of 5,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,770
of 348,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#23
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.