↓ Skip to main content

Molecular profiles for insular low-grade gliomas with putamen involvement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Molecular profiles for insular low-grade gliomas with putamen involvement
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2837-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunyao Zhou, Yongheng Wang, Xing Liu, Yuchao Liang, Ziwen Fan, Tao Jiang, Yinyan Wang, Lei Wang

Abstract

The newly proposed putamen classification system shows good prognostic value in patients with insular LGGs, yet no study towards the molecular profiles of putamen involved LGGs has been proposed. Clinical information and imaging data of patients diagnosed with insular low-grade gliomas were collected retrospectively. Genetic information of the 34 tumors was assessed using RNA-sequencing. Gene set enrichment analysis was further performed to identify the genes showing differential expression between putamen-involved tumors and putamen non-involved tumors. The level of Ki-67 expression was also evaluated. There were 843 genes identified to be differentially expressed between putamen-involved and non-involved gliomas. Specifically, Gene set enrichment analysis discovered 13 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways and 37 Gene Ontology Biological Process term were upregulated in putamen-involved low-grade glioma cells. The enriched GO sets with the highest gene counts included cell cycle (42 genes), mitotic cell cycle (24 genes), and cell division (19 genes). Furthermore, high expression of Ki-67 was associated with putamen involvement in insular gliomas. There is clear genetic variation between putamen-involved and non-involved insular low-grade gliomas. The differential expression of genes related to the processes of cell proliferation, cell migration, or DNA repair may lead to putamen involvement. The findings suggest that among the two subtypes, putamen-involved insular low-grade gliomas have higher malignancy, and the clinical treatment towards the putamen-involved insular low-grade gliomas should be more active.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,568,655
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#608
of 2,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,531
of 332,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#15
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.