↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of tandem mass spectrometry to the diagnosis of lysosomal storage disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Contribution of tandem mass spectrometry to the diagnosis of lysosomal storage disorders
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10545-017-0126-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monique Piraud, Magali Pettazzoni, Pamela Lavoie, Séverine Ruet, Cécile Pagan, David Cheillan, Philippe Latour, Christine Vianey‐Saban, Christiane Auray‐Blais, Roseline Froissart

Abstract

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a highly sensitive and specific technique. Thanks to the development of triple quadrupole analyzers, it is becoming more widely used in laboratories working in the field of inborn errors of metabolism. We review here the state of the art of this technique applied to the diagnosis of lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) and how MS/MS has changed the diagnostic rationale in recent years. This fine technology brings more sensitive, specific, and reliable methods than the previous biochemical ones for the analysis of urinary glycosaminoglycans, oligosaccharides, and sialic acid. In sphingolipidoses, the quantification of urinary sphingolipids (globotriaosylceramide, sulfatides) is possible. The measurement of new plasmatic biomarkers such as oxysterols, bile acids, and lysosphingolipids allows the screening of many sphingolipidoses and related disorders (Niemann-Pick type C), replacing tedious biochemical techniques. Applied to amniotic fluid, a more reliable prenatal diagnosis or screening of LSDs is now available for fetuses presenting with antenatal manifestations. Applied to enzyme measurements, it allows high throughput assays for the screening of large populations, even newborn screening. The advent of this new method can modify the diagnostic rationale behind LSDs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Chemistry 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,810,825
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#450
of 1,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,967
of 333,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#5
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,880 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.