↓ Skip to main content

Gold Creek Dam and its Unusual Waste Waterway (1890-1997): Design, Operation, Maintenance

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gold Creek Dam and its Unusual Waste Waterway (1890-1997): Design, Operation, Maintenance
Published in
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, January 1998
DOI 10.1139/cjce-25-4-755
Authors

Hubert Chanson, R.L. Whitmore

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Serbia 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
#53
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,475
of 93,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them