↓ Skip to main content

Decomposition of Senesced Leaf Litter is Faster in Tall Compared to Low Birch Shrub Tundra

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Decomposition of Senesced Leaf Litter is Faster in Tall Compared to Low Birch Shrub Tundra
Published in
Ecosystems, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10021-018-0240-6
Authors

Casper T. Christiansen, Michelle C. Mack, Jennie DeMarco, Paul Grogan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 33%
Environmental Science 8 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,496,651
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#385
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,968
of 333,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.