↓ Skip to main content

Balancing Antibacterial Efficacy and Reduction in Renal Function to Optimise Initial Gentamicin Dosing in Paediatric Oncology Patients

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Balancing Antibacterial Efficacy and Reduction in Renal Function to Optimise Initial Gentamicin Dosing in Paediatric Oncology Patients
Published in
The AAPS Journal, December 2017
DOI 10.1208/s12248-017-0173-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Consuelo Llanos-Paez, Christine Staatz, Stefanie Hennig

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the optimal starting dose of gentamicin in paediatric oncology patients. A population pharmacokinetic model describing drug exposure, a semi-mechanistic model describing bacterial killing and an Emax model describing renal cortex accumulation were linked in a utility function using NONMEM®. The optimal gentamicin starting dose was estimated in patients aged from 0.1 to 18.2 years, by balancing the probability of efficacy on day 1 against relative renal function reduction on day 7 with continued dosing. Using achievement of a gentamicin area under the concentration time curve to bacterial minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC) ratio of ≥ 100 and maximum concentration to MIC ratio of ≥ 10 as the efficacy endpoints, a starting dose of 7.1, 9.5, 10.8 and 14.6 mg/kg/q24h was optimal at a MIC of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg/L respectively, with ≥ 75% probability of obtainment. Using achievement of a 2-log10 bacterial count reduction at 24-h post-dose as the efficacy endpoint, a starting dose of 12.8 mg/kg/q24h was optimal, with 85.6% probability of obtainment. Under these different dosing scenarios, relative reduction in renal function ranged on average from 6.9 to 14.5% on day 7. The current recommended starting dose of gentamicin of 7.5 mg/kg/q24h may not be sufficient to achieve efficacy on day 1 if bacterial MIC is > 0.5 mg/L. A higher initial dose (up to 14.6 mg/kg/q24h), in less sensitive microorganisms, would likely cause only a relatively small reduction in renal function at day 7. Close monitoring is crucial if high doses are given, especially for longer than 7 days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Researcher 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,934,709
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#1,052
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,928
of 439,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.