↓ Skip to main content

Phylogeny of triconodonts and symmetrodonts and the origin of extant mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Doklady Botanical Sciences, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Phylogeny of triconodonts and symmetrodonts and the origin of extant mammals
Published in
Doklady Botanical Sciences, March 2011
DOI 10.1134/s0012496611010042
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. O. Averianov, A. V. Lopatin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 39%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 25%
Mathematics 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Doklady Botanical Sciences
#73
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,279
of 119,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Doklady Botanical Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them