↓ Skip to main content

Expression and Distribution of GABAA Receptor Subtypes in Human Alcoholic Cerebral Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expression and Distribution of GABAA Receptor Subtypes in Human Alcoholic Cerebral Cortex
Published in
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, January 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05183.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. TRACEY BUCKLEY, ALLISON L. ECKERT, PETER R. DODD

Abstract

Long-term alcohol abuse is known to target specific areas of the brain such as the superior frontal cortex (SFC), resulting in neuronal cell loss. Abnormal transmission of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA may contribute to this damage. Previous work in our laboratory has found differential expression and distribution of certain a subunit genes of the GABAA receptor in the SFC of human alcoholic brain, suggesting that differences in GABAA receptor subunit expression could give rise to the locally altered GABAA pharmacology which is associated with alcohol abuse. A competitive RT-PCR assay has been developed to study the expression of the GABAA receptor beta-subunit genes beta1, beta2, and beta3. A single set of primers homologous to all three beta isoform sequences has been shown to amplify each of the beta isoforms from mRNA isolated from human brain tissue obtained at autopsy. An internal standard has been designed which is identical to the target except for a 61-bp deletion and a unique restriction enzyme (RE) site. This is co-amplified with the target sequences to allow amplification efficiency to be assessed and thus enable the quantitation of gene expression. A range of GABAA receptor ligands were used to look at differential distribution of receptor subtypes in the cortical laminae by autoradiography. Differences in distribution of the ligands were demonstrated, consistent with a hypothesis of alcohol-induced variations in the expression of receptor subunits.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,205,997
of 24,585,562 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#4,177
of 11,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,899
of 162,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#698
of 2,186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.