↓ Skip to main content

Infektionen nach rekonstruktiven Wirbelsäuleneingriffen

Overview of attention for article published in Die Orthopädie, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Infektionen nach rekonstruktiven Wirbelsäuleneingriffen
Published in
Die Orthopädie, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00132-018-3557-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Burkhard Lehner, Michael Akbar, Nicholas A. Beckmann

Abstract

Postoperative surgical site infections of the spine have been described in up to 20% of patients and can result in serious consequences for the patient and substantial treatment costs. Typical bacteria often arise from skin or fecal flora. Various risk factors for infection have been described, including obesity, diabetes, high ASA scores, as well as intraoperative factors such as heavy blood loss, dural tears, or several revision procedures. Consequently, the prophylaxis with pre- and postoperative risk minimization is of particular importance. When an infection has developed, it is important to carry out early operative revision involving tissue debridement, lavage and acquiring microbiological samples for culture. If the infection presents early, the instrumentation can often be retained. Adjuvant measures such as negative pressure wound treatment may improve the outcome. In late-onset infections, due to the biofilm production on the instrument surface or in cases of implant loosening, one should attempt to remove the instrumentation, and in cases of instability replace it. This article deals with the current literature on the subject and provides an overview of the data with regard to peri- and postoperative infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Psychology 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#228
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,721
of 348,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.