| Title |
Eliminating Gender-Based Bias in Academic Medicine: More Than Naming the “Elephant in the Room”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-018-4411-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna U. Morgan, Krisda H. Chaiyachati, Gary E. Weissman, Joshua M. Liao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 74% |
| Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,100,533
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,192
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,716
of 351,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#48
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.