↓ Skip to main content

Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars —dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars —dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs
Published in
Oecologia, November 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00379522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy J. Heyneman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
United Kingdom 4 4%
Brazil 4 4%
Germany 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Costa Rica 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
China 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 75 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 72%
Environmental Science 10 10%
Engineering 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 8 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,681
of 4,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,284
of 8,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.