↓ Skip to main content

New approaches to the study of human brain networks underlying spatial attention and related processes

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
New approaches to the study of human brain networks underlying spatial attention and related processes
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00221-010-2205-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon Driver, Felix Blankenburg, Sven Bestmann, Christian C. Ruff

Abstract

Cognitive processes, such as spatial attention, are thought to rely on extended networks in the human brain. Both clinical data from lesioned patients and fMRI data acquired when healthy subjects perform particular cognitive tasks typically implicate a wide expanse of potentially contributing areas, rather than just a single brain area. Conversely, evidence from more targeted interventions, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or invasive microstimulation of the brain, or selective study of patients with highly focal brain damage, can sometimes indicate that a single brain area may make a key contribution to a particular cognitive process. But this in turn raises questions about how such a brain area may interface with other interconnected areas within a more extended network to support cognitive processes. Here, we provide a brief overview of new approaches that seek to characterise the causal role of particular brain areas within networks of several interacting areas, by measuring the effects of manipulations for a targeted area on function in remote interconnected areas. In human participants, these approaches include concurrent TMS-fMRI and TMS-EEG, as well as combination of the focal lesion method in selected patients with fMRI and/or EEG measures of the functional impact from the lesion on interconnected intact brain areas. Such approaches shed new light on how frontal cortex and parietal cortex modulate sensory areas in the service of attention and cognition, for the normal and damaged human brain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 173 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 19%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 33%
Neuroscience 29 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 27 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#900
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,737
of 95,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.