↓ Skip to main content

Locating Event-Based Causal Effects: A Configural Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Locating Event-Based Causal Effects: A Configural Perspective
Published in
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12124-018-9423-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander von Eye, Wolfgang Wiedermann

Abstract

Statistical models for the analysis of hypotheses that are compatible with direction dependence were originally specified based on the linear model. In these models, relations among variables reflected directional or causal hypotheses. In a number of causal theories, however, effects are defined as resulting from causes that did versus did not occur. To accommodate this type of theory, the present article proposes analyzing directional or causal hypotheses at the level of configurations. Causes thus have the effect that, in a particular sector of the data space, the density of cases increases or decreases. With reference to log-linear models of direction dependence, this article specifies base models for the configural analysis of directional or causal hypotheses. In contrast to standard configural analysis, the models are applied in a confirmatory context. Specific direction dependence hypotheses are analyzed. In a simulation study, it is shown that the proposed methods have good power to identify the sectors in the data space in which density exceeds or falls below expectation. In a data example, it is shown that the evolutionary hypothesis that body size determines brain size is confirmed in particular for higher vertebrates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,148,784
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
#76
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,966
of 335,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.