↓ Skip to main content

Fusion Between Transcription Factor CBFβ/PEBP2β and a Myosin Heavy Chain in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
676 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fusion Between Transcription Factor CBFβ/PEBP2β and a Myosin Heavy Chain in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published in
Science, August 1993
DOI 10.1126/science.8351518
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pu Liu, Susan A. Tarlé, Amitav Hajra, David F. Claxton, Paula Marlton, Matthew Freedman, Michael J. Siciliano, Francis S. Collins

Abstract

The pericentric inversion of chromosome 16 [inv(16)(p13q22)] is a characteristic karyotypic abnormality associated with acute myeloid leukemia, most commonly of the M4Eo subtype. The 16p and 16q breakpoints were pinpointed by yeast artificial chromosome and cosmid cloning, and the two genes involved in this inversion were identified. On 16q the inversion occurred near the end of the coding region for CBF beta, also known as PEBP2 beta, a subunit of a heterodimeric transcription factor regulating genes expressed in T cells; on 16p a smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC) gene (MYH11) was interrupted. In six of six inv(16) patient samples tested, an in-frame fusion messenger RNA was demonstrated that connected the first 165 amino acids of CBF beta with the tail region of SMMHC. The repeated coiled coil of SMMHC may result in dimerization of the CBF beta fusion protein, which in turn would lead to alterations in transcriptional regulation and contribute to leukemic transformation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Singapore 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 78 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,339,603
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Science
#34,036
of 78,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,104
of 20,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#31
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.