↓ Skip to main content

Response of photosynthesis and respiration of resurrection plants to desiccation and rehydration

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, February 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Response of photosynthesis and respiration of resurrection plants to desiccation and rehydration
Published in
Planta, February 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00392810
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. B. Schwab, U. Schreiber, U. Heber

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 5%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,548,107
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#607
of 2,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,337
of 53,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.