↓ Skip to main content

Alzheimer's disease and endocytic dysfunction: Clues from the Down syndrome-related proteins, DSCR1 and ITSN1

Overview of attention for article published in Ageing Research Reviews, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alzheimer's disease and endocytic dysfunction: Clues from the Down syndrome-related proteins, DSCR1 and ITSN1
Published in
Ageing Research Reviews, January 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.arr.2005.11.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Damien J. Keating, Chen Chen, Melanie A. Pritchard

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS) is a genetically-based disorder which results in multiple conditions for sufferers. Amongst these is a common early incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) which usually affects DS individuals by their mid 40s. This fact provides a clue that one or more of the genes located on chromosome 21 may be involved in the onset of AD. Current evidence suggests that endosomal disorders may underlie the earliest pathology of AD, preceding the classical pathological markers of beta-amyloid plaque deposition and neurofibrillary tangles. Therefore, any genes involved in endocytosis and vesicle trafficking which are over-expressed in DS are novel candidates in the pathogenesis of AD. Intersectin-1 (ITSN1) and Down syndrome candidate region 1 (DSCR1) are two such genes. Extensive in vitro data and data from Drosophila indicates that the over-expression of either of these genes or their products results in inhibition or ablation of endocytosis in neuronal as well as non-neuronal cells. This review discusses in detail the known and potential roles of ITSN1 and DSCR1 in DS, AD, endocytosis and vesicle trafficking.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 65 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2007.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ageing Research Reviews
#1,156
of 1,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,536
of 170,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ageing Research Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them