| Title |
Using Movie Clips to Promote Reflective Practice: a Creative Approach for Teaching Ethics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asian Bioethics Review, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s41649-018-0046-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo González Blasco, Graziela Moreto, Leo Pessini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Singapore | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Design | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 27% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#13,068,996
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Asian Bioethics Review
#169
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,333
of 332,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Bioethics Review
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.