↓ Skip to main content

Conversion of CO2 into biomass by microalgae: how realistic a contribution may it be to significant CO2 removal?

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Conversion of CO2 into biomass by microalgae: how realistic a contribution may it be to significant CO2 removal?
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00253-012-4362-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Gabriel Acién Fernández, C. V. González-López, J. M. Fernández Sevilla, E. Molina Grima

Abstract

Microalgae have been proposed as a CO(2) removal option to contribute to climate change avoidance and problems coming from the use of fossil fuels. However, even though microalgae can be used to fix CO(2) from air or flue gases, they do not permit long-term CO(2) storage because they are easily decomposed. On the other hand, microalgae can contribute to an enhancement in human sustainability by producing biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuels in addition to the production of other useful chemicals and commodities. Moreover, microalgae can contribute to enhancing the sustainability of waste treatment processes, reducing the energy consumed, and improving the recycling of nutrients contained within them. This paper reviews the potential contribution of these processes and the existing knowledge in these areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 331 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 19%
Student > Master 62 17%
Researcher 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 62 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 20%
Environmental Science 55 15%
Engineering 49 14%
Chemical Engineering 28 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 93 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,519,483
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,098
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,735
of 172,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#9
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.