| Title |
Assessment of the genetic connectivity between farmed and wild populations of Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae) in a representative traditional farming region of China by using newly developed microsatellite markers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-018-1449-7 |
| Authors |
Tifeng Shan, Shaojun Pang, Xuemei Wang, Jing Li, Li Su |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,469,520
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1,346
of 2,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,590
of 332,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#33
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.