| Title |
Synergistic immunostimulating activity of pidotimod and red ginseng acidic polysaccharide against cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Pharmacal Research, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12272-001-1282-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiao Fei Du, Cheng Zhe Jiang, Chun Fu Wu, Eun Kyung Won, Se Young Choung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#366
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,352
of 92,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.