↓ Skip to main content

Hypercomplex numbers, lie groups, and the creation of group representation theory

Overview of attention for article published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences, January 1972
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Hypercomplex numbers, lie groups, and the creation of group representation theory
Published in
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, January 1972
DOI 10.1007/bf00328434
Authors

Thomas Hawkins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 83%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,548,107
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#71
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,227
of 16,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them