↓ Skip to main content

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus immune evasion and virulence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus immune evasion and virulence
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00109-009-0573-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shawna F. Graves, Scott D. Kobayashi, Frank R. DeLeo

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a significant cause of human infections globally. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) emerged in the early 1960s and is now endemic in most healthcare facilities. Although healthcare-associated MRSA infections remain a major problem in most industrialized countries, those caused by community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) are now the most abundant cause of bacterial infections in the community in some parts of the world, such as the United States. The basis for the emergence and subsequent success of CA-MRSA is incompletely defined. However, the ability of the pathogen to cause disease in otherwise healthy individuals is likely attributed, in part, to its ability to circumvent killing by the innate immune system, which includes survival after phagocytosis by neutrophils. In this review, we discuss the role of neutrophils in host defense against S. aureus and highlight progress made toward understanding mechanisms of CA-MRSA virulence and pathogenesis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 80 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 27%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 10 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,856,217
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#234
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,745
of 166,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.