↓ Skip to main content

Citramalate lyase of Clostridium tetanomorphum

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, March 1967
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Citramalate lyase of Clostridium tetanomorphum
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, March 1967
DOI 10.1007/bf00406311
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. A. Barker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#641
of 3,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#491
of 2,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.