↓ Skip to main content

Mass scaling of the resting and maximum metabolic rates of the black carp

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Mass scaling of the resting and maximum metabolic rates of the black carp
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00360-018-1154-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Lv, Hang Xie, Danyang Xia, Cong Shen, Jian Li, Yiping Luo

Abstract

We investigated the body mass (M) scaling of resting metabolic rate (RMR), maximum metabolic rate (MMR), excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC), blood parameters, and organ masses of black carp (Mylopharyngoden piceus). The results showed that RMR scaled with M of the fish by an exponent (b) of 0.833 (bR), which was significantly larger than 0.75. MMR scaled with M by a power of 0.775 (bM), which was significantly lower than 1 and may be due to a small size proportion of red muscle. No difference between bR and bM or correlation between factorial aerobic scope and M was found. However, EPOC scaled positively with M by a power of 1.231, suggesting a constant aerobic capacity and an enhanced anaerobic capacity with fish growth. Mass of the inactive organs scaled with M by a power of 1.005, which was significantly larger than 1 and was negatively correlated with RMR, suggesting that the proportion of inactive organs increases with fish growth, which may contribute to the negative scaling of RMR. Red blood cell surface area (S) did not increase with increasing M, suggesting that the ontogenetic decrease in the surface area to volume ratio of cells may not contribute to the negative scaling of RMR. The predicted bR value (0.846) by the average S (1.746 µm²) differs by only 1.62% from the observed bR value using our previously reported S - bR function in carp, suggesting that the species-specific cell size, rather than its ontogenetic change, affects the metabolic scaling of a species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 35%
Environmental Science 4 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#21,866,582
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#744
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,435
of 336,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.