You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
No Benefit of Ticagrelor Pretreatment Compared With Treatment During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
|
---|---|
Published in |
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1161/circinterventions.117.005528 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sasha Koul, J Gustav Smith, Matthias Götberg, Elmir Omerovic, Joakim Alfredsson, Dimitrios Venetsanos, Jonas Persson, Jens Jensen, Bo Lagerqvist, Björn Redfors, Stefan James, David Erlinge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,337,514
of 25,525,181 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
#356
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,488
of 345,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,525,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.