↓ Skip to main content

An Appreciation of Clifford Truesdell

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Elasticity, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 127)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An Appreciation of Clifford Truesdell
Published in
Journal of Elasticity, January 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:elas.0000005611.25238.29
Authors

James Serrin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Elasticity
#15
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,675
of 136,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Elasticity
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.