| Title |
Genetic tools for the investigation of Roseobacter clade bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-9-265 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanja Piekarski, Ina Buchholz, Thomas Drepper, Max Schobert, Irene Wagner-Doebler, Petra Tielen, Dieter Jahn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 31% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,758,243
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#510
of 3,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,183
of 164,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,213 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.