↓ Skip to main content

Necrobiotic xanthogranuloma: a 30-year single-center experience

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Necrobiotic xanthogranuloma: a 30-year single-center experience
Published in
Annals of Hematology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00277-018-3301-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Talal Hilal, David J. DiCaudo, Suzanne M. Connolly, Craig B. Reeder

Abstract

To characterize the clinical features, associated disorders, and treatment of necrobiotic xanthogranuloma (NXG), a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis, we conducted a retrospective review of pathologically confirmed NXG at Mayo Clinic Arizona from 1987 to June 2017. Data on clinical findings, laboratory findings, associated disorders, therapy, and response to therapy were extracted. Nineteen patients were identified. Mean age was 54 years (range, 17-84) with equal gender distribution. Median follow-up was 5.5 years (range, 1-18). Most patients had a detectable monoclonal protein (84%), and IgG kappa constituted 58%. The most common cutaneous lesions involved the periorbital region (53%). The majority of patients had extracutaneous manifestations, most commonly affecting the liver (32%) and the sinuses (21%). Hematologic malignancies were diagnosed in 26% of patients and included Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), smoldering myeloma, and multiple myeloma. The most common treatment was chlorambucil with or without systemic corticosteroids. Response was seen in most patients (95%), and most patients received 1-3 lines of therapy (74%). NXG is a reactive histiocytic disorder that commonly involves multiple organ systems and requires a high degree of clinical suspicion for accurate diagnosis. Treatment decisions should be based on coexisting conditions and pattern of disease involvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,302,503
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#1,242
of 2,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,667
of 335,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#20
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.