↓ Skip to main content

Fatal methemoglobinemia complicating alkaptonuria (ochronosis): a rare presentation

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Fatal methemoglobinemia complicating alkaptonuria (ochronosis): a rare presentation
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12024-018-9965-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda R. Freeman, Stephen M. Wills

Abstract

A 61-year-old female died in hospital with multiple organ failure 4 weeks following presentation with acute kidney injury, hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia. At autopsy, brown to black discoloration of cartilages was observed. Histology revealed brown pigmentation of the hyaline cartilage, with focal full-thickness erosion of the articular hyaline cartilage, characteristic of alkaptonuria (ochronosis). Although alkaptonuria is rarely fatal, this case illustrates a rare acute fatal complication. Accumulation of circulating homgentisic acid secondary to acute derangement of renal function is believed to have overwhelmed the endogenous antioxidant processes, resulting in hemolysis and methemoglobinemia, which were refractory to treatment. Small numbers of cases have previously been reported in the literature in patients known to suffer with the disease, all of which were preceded by acute kidney injury. Whilst the clinical diagnosis of alkaptonuria may be challenging, the autopsy findings of this rare condition are striking and this case illustrates the utility of the autopsy, albeit retrospectively, in arriving at a diagnosis. To our knowledge this is the first reported case where previously undiagnosed alkaptonuria has presented with methemoglobinemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,427,897
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#270
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,835
of 334,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.