↓ Skip to main content

The role of PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Imaging, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The role of PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical and Translational Imaging, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40336-018-0269-8
Authors

Anna Rita Cervino, Lea Cuppari, Pasquale Reccia, Marta Burei, Giorgio Saladini, Laura Evangelista

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 78%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,495,840
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Imaging
#163
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,232
of 332,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Imaging
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.