↓ Skip to main content

Cyclopean stimulation can influence sensations of self-motion in normal and stereoblind subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, March 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Cyclopean stimulation can influence sensations of self-motion in normal and stereoblind subjects
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, March 1980
DOI 10.3758/bf03204339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy M. Wolfe, Richard Held

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 6%
United Kingdom 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 12 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Professor 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 19%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#581
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,655
of 6,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them