| Title |
Comparative Structure Analysis of Vertebrate U17 Small Nucleolar RNA (snoRNA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00239-001-0065-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuela Cervelli, Francesco Cecconi, Marcello Giorgi, Flavia Annesi, Marco Oliverio, Paolo Mariottini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2008.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#450
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,999
of 222,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.