↓ Skip to main content

Staged insertion of growing rods in severe scoliosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Staged insertion of growing rods in severe scoliosis
Published in
European Spine Journal, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5552-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastiaan Schelfaut, Jennifer A. Dermott, Reinhard Zeller

Abstract

The objective of this retrospective chart and radiographic review was to present the clinical outcomes and complication rate of a staged approach to modern dual growing-rod (GR) surgery when treating children with severe early onset scoliosis. Fifteen patients received a 6-mm dual GR system. During Stage 1, pairs of end vertebra were exposed in a subperiosteal fashion, instrumented, grafted, and fused. Stage 2 was performed, on average, 5 months later (range 8-35 weeks) and the fused foundations were connected with two growing rods under skull-femoral traction. Clinical and operative notes were reviewed and all complications were recorded. Radiographic measurements were assessed at pre-index, with intraoperative traction during Stage 1, post-Stage 2 and at most recent follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate change in scoliosis and kyphosis. At initial surgery, the average age was 8.17 ± 1.5 years. The mean Cobb angle was 88.1° ± 14.0°, corrected to 60.3° ± 8.7° (p < 0.001) with intraoperative traction in Stage 1, preserved after Stage 2 instrumentation (59.5° ± 9.6°, p = 0.69), and maintained with subsequent lengthenings (60.6° ± 12.8°, p = 0.73). Hyperkyphosis (11/15 patients) improved from 70.8° ± 15.7° to 46.6° ± 9.7° (p < 0.001). At minimum 2-year follow-up (range 24-80 months, mean 49.5), the complication rate was 14 (0.93 complications/patient), including 6 rod breakages, 6 superficial infections, and 2 deep infections. No anchor migration or pull-out was noted. Seven patients have undergone definitive posterior spinal fusion. Staged insertion of dual GR systems permits strong distraction, with acceptable correction of severe deformities and minimal complications. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Other 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,591,506
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,504
of 4,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,517
of 331,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#41
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,670 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.