↓ Skip to main content

Inherited pulmonary cylindromas: extending the phenotype of CYLD mutation carriers

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Dermatology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inherited pulmonary cylindromas: extending the phenotype of CYLD mutation carriers
Published in
British Journal of Dermatology, May 2018
DOI 10.1111/bjd.16573
Pubmed ID
Authors

S.M. Brown, M. Arefi, R. Stones, P.S. Loo, S. Barnard, C. Bloxham, N. Stefanos, J.A.A. Langtry, S. Worthy, E. Calonje, A. Husain, N. Rajan

Abstract

Germline mutations in the tumour suppressor gene CYLD are recognised to be associated with the development of multiple cutaneous cylindromas. We encountered such a patient who presented with breathlessness due to multiple pulmonary cylindromas. Patients with rare genetic diseases are poorly studied, so we searched for clinical and radiological features of multiple pulmonary cylindromas in a cohort of 16 patients with CYLD mutations. A retrospective case note review was carried out in a tertiary dermatogenetics clinic where CYLD mutation carriers are reviewed on an annual basis. In depth investigation was carried out for patients with pulmonary tumours. 4 patients had radiological imaging of their lungs, of which 2 had multiple pulmonary cylindromas that were confirmed histologically. Serial CT monitoring allowed for pre-emptive endobronchial laser ablation, preventing major airway obstruction and pulmonary collapse. Pulmonary cylindromas are an unrecognised, but infrequently symptomatic, aspect of the phenotype in these patients that can have implications for patient care. They should be considered in patients with a high tumour burden that present with respiratory symptoms, and where appropriate monitored with serial imaging. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Unknown 8 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,097,241
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Dermatology
#6,072
of 9,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,486
of 344,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Dermatology
#90
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.