↓ Skip to main content

Diverse prevalence of large deletions within the OA1 gene in ocular albinism type 1 patients from Europe and North America

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Diverse prevalence of large deletions within the OA1 gene in ocular albinism type 1 patients from Europe and North America
Published in
Human Genetics, January 2001
DOI 10.1007/s004390000440
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Bassi, Arthur Bergen, Pierre Bitoun, Stephen Charles, Maurizio Clementi, Richard Gosselin, Jane Hurst, Richard Lewis, Birgit Lorenz, Thomas Meitinger, Ludwine Messiaen, Rajkumar Ramesar, Andrea Ballabio, M. Schiaffino

Abstract

Ocular albinism type 1 (OA1) is an X-linked disorder mainly characterized by congenital nystagmus and photodysphoria, moderate to severe reduction of visual acuity, hypopigmentation of the retina, and the presence of macromelanosomes in the skin and eyes. We have previously isolated the gene for OA1 and characterized its protein product as melanosomal membrane glycoprotein displaying structural and functional features of G protein-coupled receptors. We and others have identified mutations of various types within the OA1 gene in patients with this disorder, including deletions and splice site, frameshift, nonsense, and missense mutations. However, different prevalences of large intragenic deletions have been reported, ranging from 10% to 50% in independent studies. To determine whether these differences might be related to the geographic origin of the OA1 families tested, we performed a further extensive mutation analysis study leading to the identification of pathogenic mutations in 30 unrelated OA1 patients mainly from Europe and North America. These results, together with our earlier mutation reports on OA1, allow us to resolve the apparent discrepancies between previous studies and point to a substantial difference in the frequency of large intragenic deletions in European (<10%) compared with North American (>50%) OA1 families. These observations and our overall refinement of point mutation distribution within the OA1 gene have important implications for the molecular diagnosis of OA1 and for the establishment of any mutation detection program for this disorder.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 32%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#1,014
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,248
of 114,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.